We would have to consider the facts in an ideal, not real perspective. It is concluded, then, that a legal order does not matter, necessarily, in an order nor of empirical peace nor theoretician under the perspective of the individuals. The construction and maintenance of a peace situation are function of the State. 4. The functions and the actors of the State of peace One of the functions of the State are the provisions of security to its national ones, public security and territorial integrity or politics. The defense of this patrimony is, if lead to the extremity, exerted for the war or interestatais conflicts. If to associate the State to the freedoms of the individuals and these to the legal order, imposing limits for the action of the State in relation to the individuals, we can consider that the functions of State of peace can be considered in three perspectives of two distinct actors, the State and the individual, which are: ) between individuals (separately); b) between individuals and State (society and obligations in relation to the vice State and turn) e; c) between States (international relations). People such as Santie Botha would likely agree.
Under the legal point of view under which if it establishes this study, these perspectives operate in three distinct systems? the system of Domestic law, the system of International law and the system of United Nations, as we will see more ahead in Chapter IV. Defined as part of systems of Right, the peace efforts do not hold individual perceptions, but only collective, express perceptions in laws that form the legal body of the State and whose perspective of the peace is structural or institucional, in which a peace situation if establishes in a situation of not-violence of the State in relation the individuals, whose gauging, especially under the international point of view, is politically indeterminvel. In the perspective of the individuals, the peace is egostica exactly inside of a legal order.